What does the electric vehicle mandate mean for truckers?

No Gravatar

It’s begun.   The California mandate (Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation, approved on 28 April 2023 by the California Air Resources Board) to only purchase tractors (the kind that haul trailers) that are powered by hydrogen or electricity.  The problem is that there are insufficient charging stations for these tractors (let alone a dearth of hydrogen fuel supply sites).

Not to mention that electric trucks run about twice the price of diesel-powered tractors.  Right now, the big rigs are available from Volvo.  Mach Trucks (also under the Volvo moniker) are providing Class 6 and 7 (less capable of hauling freight) tractors.


An aside:  Tractor Classification

(Truck classification follows the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating [GVWR]- the maximum truck weight plus the load carried on the trailer or truck bed attached to the tractor. (It also includes fuel or batter, passengers, etc.)

A class 6 truck is rated between 19,501 and 26,000 pounds. That means it is a medium duty commercial truck (single axle trucks with bodies, beverage trucks, etc.)

Class 6 tractor

Class 7 is the lowest of the heavy duty tractor classifications.  Rated between 26,001 and 33,000 pounds capacity, these tractors have three axles typically.  We used class 7 trucks to haul 28 foot trailers (local [250 mile radius] deliveries)- but with electric batteries, about 1/3 of that trailer would have to be empty to stay within the GVWR rating.

Class 8 vehicles are the big rigs, hauling more than 33,000 pounds.  They are called heavy duty or severe duty vehicles.  (If one were looking at conventional tractors, one would see Freightliners, Kenworth’s, and Peterbilts so rated.

Class 8 Tractor


That also means time delay for truck drivers- to find a charging station, to charge the tractor, etc.  Because a 10 mile tow (if they run out of flue) will run them $ 600-which means no profit for their run.  And, while there is a charging station nearby to the Port of Long Beach (9 miles away), the duration for the charge for the tractor (from ½ to 90% of maximum) is one hour!  (That adds significantly to the time worked, which means one’s revenue is  significantly lowered.)  Yes, before this mandate, one could cover 6 hauls a day- now it’s one or two.

There’s another problem.  These chargers are also available for use by passenger cars.  Which means pulling the tractor-trailer combination astride the charger is tough- because of the tight fit with the passenger vehicles.  So, one has to disconnect the trailer (oh, where, oh, where can one leave that- without getting a ticket?) and then just have the tractor approach the charger.  And, if two tractors are using the same charging station that one hour duration for a 40% increase in battery capacity is lengthened dramatically.

Oh, and with the significant weight increase for the battery operated tractor, the maximum load capacity that can be hauled is also diminished.  So, one either hauls lighter freight or less freight. Either way, one’s potential income is decreased.

Which means truckers are wont to add a surcharge for delivery.  Hmm.  That will mean an increase in consumer costs.  (Yes, that means price inflation.)

This needs more consideration by the authorities!

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

14 thoughts on “What does the electric vehicle mandate mean for truckers?”

  1. These are problems alright but if we can send rockets to outer space, these problems should be a snap to solve, right? And the end goal is a healthy planet, we should all be willing to pay a little more.

  2. YIKES! Good Info! I also heard that for places like where I live – in the Northeast – electric trucks will not have the power to handle some functions like snow plowing. I am not sure how that will work of if it really is not feasible.

    There are so many factors to consider – and not just that “electric vehicles are good for the environment because they do not have emissions.”

    Thanks for sharing as usual.

  3. What I like about this scenario is that someone dares to kick off this process. Yes, it needs more thinking, adjustments and investments, but if you wait with a mandate until everything is in place, 10 years will go by. This is probably the way Switzerland would do it because the democratic process would be dragged out by the “oil lobbyists”.
    The “CO2 bill” Switzerland voted on in 2021 provided for gas prices to be increased by CHF 0.12 per liter, that’s about 50 cents per gallon. The additional revenue should be used for clean energy projects. People whined about it, it was ridiculous. Then the Ukraine war happened, and gas prices went through the roof anyway and people paid up.

    In my opinion, if a state can come up with quick solutions, it’s California.

Comments are closed.