Where do you stand on this change?

No Gravatar

It’s been 8 years since I wrote about this topic.  And, no, it’s not because my son (the youngest of all my children) has long been out of school.  But, it’s because since the last (imho) screwup of this elite school, not many additional (bad) choices have been made.

But, obviously that’s about to change.

I’m pretty sure most of you heard about the “super”schools that exist in New York City.  Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Tech, Arts and Music, and Bronx Science.   These schools, while public, have entrance exams to ensure that the best of the best matriculate.  (Back when I was in college, Brooklyn Tech was the ‘feeder school’ for my undergraduate school- Brooklyn Poly.  Now that Brooklyn Poly has been kidnaped by NYU, I have no clue as to what obtains.)

Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology

I’m not sure many of you have heard of the “super” school that exists in Northern Virginia.  The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology has been considered the No. 1 or No. 2 public high school in the States- almost for the entirety of its 35 year existence.  Like the schools in NY City, there have been entrance requirements.  And, like the schools in NY City, TJ graduates have their choice of colleges and generally place well (including winning) the Regeneron High School Science Fair.

But…

Folks are worried that Latino and Black enrollment (single digit representation) at TJ is fairly limited.  The graduating class of 2024  will have 10 Blacks among them.  (The graduating class of 1800 is about 70% Asian, 20% White, 2.6% Hispanic, and under 2% who were Black.  Oh- and only 1.7% (regardless of race) are low income students.

Demographics at Thomas Jefferson High

So, Scott Brabrand (Fairfax Schools Superintendent) is proposing to kill the two part entrance exam, the application fee, and the need for teacher recommendations.  Oh, wait- it gets better.  The five regions that TJ covers will have a lottery system to discern who gets to go.  No academic elites. (The only other requirement is a 3.5 GPA [which is higher than the current minimum of 3.0- but then, there are those rigorous admission tests] and “enrollment” in Algebra I- not even its successful  completion!)

Lottery Anyone?

(The five regions are not equally represented.  But, that’s because  Fairfax kids are the primary target.  The surrounding communities (Arlington, Loudoun, Prince William, and the City of Falls Church) reimburse Fairfax County for the costs of educating their elite children at TJ. The City of Alexandria School Board refuses to participate. So, the student class is 18 from Arlington, 2 from Falls Church, 68 from Prince William, and 62 from Loudoun- with 350 coming from Fairfax.)

So, the plan is to dumb down the school so more Blacks and Hispanics matriculate?  Instead of finding the qualified minority kids and encouraging them to learn at TJ?   That’s NOT a racist concept?  Jeez.

I admit that the current system only accepts 19% of the applicants.  And, while the system has been race-blind, socioeconomic status certainly does affect the results.  The wealthier parents purchase coaching, test prep, and the like for their kids to ensure they can get in.

It’s also true that many kids DON’T want to be TJ-ers.  Data demonstrate that the chances to be accepted at a top college are reduced.  (Paul Attewell of CUNY (City University of New York) found that Ivy League schools take more kids from neighborhood rather than elite high schools.  As an example, its quoted that only 12 of the 91 TJ 2000 graduates were accepted by Harvard.  Except Harvard would not want a significant portion of its freshman class to come from one place- so that’s not much of “an example”.) Plus, TJ is considered a pressure-cooker- or a place where a bunch of overachievers support and inspire their compatriots to obtain one of the best STEM educations around.

And, Fairfax County (where TJ officially resides) has not done a stellar job of opening up gifted-and-talented programs to those who are neither White nor Asian (minorities only comprise 18% of those in the program.)  This new concept claims it will raise Black enrollment to 6% and Hispanic enrollment to 8%, plus the lower economic strata would comprise almost 11% of the new students- but it would exclude about 300 folks who would really benefit from the elite program as they would under the obtaining rules now.

As a matter of fact, when I first wrote about TJ about a decade ago a new “open” enrollment program was being instituted.  And, as you can see from the above numbers, the school hasn’t gathered in the minority students.

Since I wrote this, the School Board nixed the big lottery and the entrance exam and application fee- cutting the lottery down to 300 (from 400), with the rest (now 200 others) picked by capabilities.  But, that may not be the last word.

Stay tuned for what actually happens.


Today, the 19th of October, the Washington Post (online) posted the thoughts of a Black TJ Student.  It is a worthwhile read.  (Yes, she is a proponent of the lottery- of which I am not.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2020/10/19/thomas-jefferson-high-school-diversity

Didi Elsyad, TJ Student

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

14 thoughts on “Where do you stand on this change?”

  1. Wow – this is going to be a hot topic in the future for sure. In my opinion, a black or Hispanic who would want to go to one of these schools should be able to test, not get in because of their ethnicity. And you know what? I’m sure they would want it that way too. They want to look as though they can compete with all the other students, not look like a help-case, and not as smart. It is true that blacks and Hispanics have to work harder to get where they want (ask my Hispanic husband) . I think that schools can certainly find other ways to level the playing field.

  2. It seems like preference finds a way to exclude as sophisticated users and participants figure out how to game the system. This is more of the same that we see in business, tech, finance, and other areas where bias exists. I wish I were more hopeful for meaningful change in the near future.

  3. We are currently reading on prop 16 here in CA (among others) before we complete our ballots to drop off at the closest center..
    And while I am all for diversity – based on race, socioeconomic status, and etc, I do agree with you that there also needs to a look at merit and even interest .. the truly deserving ones from each background rather than a blinder lottery system..

    1. First- we need to upgrade our schools. (Like the rest of our infrastructure- it’s all dated and almost decrepit.)
      But, if we hope to stay a leader in the world, we need to promote our best and brightest.

      Thanks for the visit and the comment, Vidya.

  4. As someone who is a graduate of Bronx Science from years back, I believe Bronx Science may have saved my life. My neighborhood was rapidly going downhill and the high school I would have gone to was not the place you would have wanted your child to go to. I would want all minorities to have the same opportunities that I, a white woman who grew up in public housing, had. I was able to escape. I support the testing – I think it’s a good way to level the field if there is a way to structure the exam so that high income parents can’t game the system with test prep for their teens. What bother me is that your schools have an entrance or testing fee? That should be eliminated. Totally opposed to a lottery. Entrance should be based on merit. I do think teacher recommendations have their place but not sure how much they should be weighed in the entrance process. It’s a good question, Roy – I actually have no idea how Bronx Science works their entrance requirements nowadays.
    Alana recently posted..Garden Bloggers Bloom Day October 2020

Comments are closed.